nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fiber cut in SF area


From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:25:26 -0700

Anyone know how banks in the Bay Area did through this? I wonder how many
banks went dark and whether they had any backup plans/connectivity. Me
thinks its doubtful.

I also wonder if the bigger pharmacies such as Longs, Walgreens, Rite-Aid,
Etc had thought about these kinds of issues? I personally doubt it. I bet
you they went dark along with everyone else. Unfortunate.

The funny thing is that the California lottery would be somewhat immuned to
this kind of disaster as they actually use Hughes VSAT at every single
retailer.

Sorry for the random thoughts...

-Mike


On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Roger Marquis wrote:

The real problem is route redundancy.  This is what the original contract
from DARPA to BBM, to create the Internet, was about!  "The net" was
created to enable communications bttn point A and point B in this exact
scenario.


Uh, not exactly.  There was diversity in this case, but there was also N+1
breaks.  Outside of a few counties in the Bay Area, the rest of the
country's telecommunication system was unaffected.  So in that sense the
system worked as designed.

Read the original DARPA papers, they were not about making sure grandma
could still make a phone call.


 For a good "man in the street" perspective of how the outage effected
things like a pharmacy's ability to fill subscriptions and a university
computer's ability to boot check out a couple of shows broadcast on KUSP
(Santa Cruz Public Radio) this morning:


Why didn't the "man in the street" pharmacy have its own backup plans?

Why didn't the pharmacy also have a COMCAST or RCN broadband connection for
alternative Internet access besides AT&T or Verizon, a Citizens Band radio
channel 9 for alternative emergency communications besides 9-1-1,
a satellite phone for alternative communications besides local cell phones,
and a Hughes VSAT dish for yet even more diversity?  Why was the pharmacy
relying on a single provider?  Or do it the old-fashion way before computers
and telecommunications; keep a backup paper file of their records so they
could continue to fill prescriptions?

Why didn't the pharmacy have more self-diversity? Probably the usual
reason, more diversity costs more.  That may be the reason why hospitals
have more diversity than neighborhood pharmacies; and emergency rooms have
other ways to get medicine.  Maintaining diversity and backups is probably
also part of the reason why filling a prescription at a hospital is much
more expensive than filling a prescription at your neighborhood pharmacy.

Likewise, why didn't grandma have her own pharmacy backup plan. Don't wait
until the last minute to refill a critical presciption, have backup copies
of prescriptions with her doctor, have an account with an alternative
pharmacist in case her primary pharmacist isn't reachable, etc.

Readiness works better if everyone does their part, including grandma.

Next time it won't be AT&T, it will be Cox or Comcast or Qwest or Level 3
or Global Crossing or .... or .... or .... .  It won't be vandalism, it will
be an earthquake, backhoe, gas main explosion, operator error, ....

Everything fails sometimes.  What's your plan?

http://www.ready.gov/

personal opinion only




Current thread: