nanog mailing list archives
RE: The real issue
From: "Shane Ronan" <sronan () fattoc com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:05:00 -0400
No, but they can sure send them a bill and then go after them for collections when they don't pay it. -----Original Message----- From: christopher.morrow () gmail com [mailto:christopher.morrow () gmail com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:34 PM To: Shane Ronan Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: The real issue On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com> wrote:
Very simple, just do it.
This isn't nike... I'm sorry for being obtuse, but they (arin) can't really do anything. I suspect that if they had to prosecute all folks in violation of the RSA they would have financial issues... and it wouldn't really solve anything long term anyway. In short, ARIN can't affect routability ARIN can't effectively deal with the contract issues in a timely fashion So.. what are they going to 'just do'? -Chris
On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>
wrote:
It's means one of two things:sure, but 'how' exactly?1) Recoup the unused space for paid reallocation orarin never (nor do any RIR) guarantee routability, nor do they even a method to affect routability of a network.2) Have the current "owner" pay the market rate for the IP space... that's somewhat hard since the current policies don't support that, and there is no real legal stance for legacy-allocations... For allocated post-legacy-times ARIN can start court proceedings, but ... that's a lengthy process and expensive. -ChrisOn Apr 21, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>
wrote:
Is ARIN, who won't even take back large blocks of space from
people who
have long ago stopped using it and aren't paying anything for it,
prepared
to start filing civil suits against people who were assigned /24's
(and
paid for them) due to inaccurate declaration?out of curiousity.. 'take back' means what in this context?<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
Current thread:
- The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Mike Lewinski (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Crooks, Sam (Apr 21)