nanog mailing list archives
RE: Link capacity upgrade threshold
From: Erik L <erik_list () caneris com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:41:41 -0400
If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity,it's time tostart planning the upgrade.s/80/60/ the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* missthe bursts. s/60/40/
What is this "upgrade" thing you all speak of? When your links become saturated, shouldn't you solve the problem by deploying DPI-based application-discriminatory throttling and start double-dipping your customers? After all, it's their fault for using up more bandwidth than your flawed business model told you they will use. (If you're not familiar with Bell Canada, it's OK if you don't get the joke).
Current thread:
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold, (continued)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold William Herrin (Aug 29)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 29)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 29)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Nick Hilliard (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Peter Hicks (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Shane Ronan (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Nick Hilliard (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold William Herrin (Aug 29)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Kevin Oberman (Aug 30)
- RE: Link capacity upgrade threshold Erik L (Aug 30)
- Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold Mohacsi Janos (Aug 31)