nanog mailing list archives
Re: news from Google
From: Chris Hills <chaz () chaz6 com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:09:51 +0100
On 08/12/09 23:19, Tony Finch wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Chris Hills wrote:I maintain a list here [1], many of which are reachable with IPv6. [1] http://www.chaz6.com/files/resolv.confNot all of those are open resolvers, so I wonder what the cirteria for listing are. I'm especially surprised to see the IPv6 addresses of Cambridge's resolvers there.
The criteria is basically "any server with a public ipv4/ipv6 address that provides a recursive dns service". Those that may be unreachable from off-net are marked "filtered". I have added a note explaining this.
Current thread:
- Re: news from Google, (continued)
- Re: news from Google Jorge Amodio (Dec 04)
- IP address as a service identifier can be harmful (was "Re: news from Google") Dave Plonka (Dec 04)
- Re: news from Google Martin Hannigan (Dec 04)
- Re: news from Google bmanning (Dec 04)
- Re: news from Google Martin Hannigan (Dec 04)
- Re: news from Google Ben Carleton (Dec 04)
- Re: news from Google Steve Meuse (Dec 07)
- Re: news from Google Chris Hills (Dec 05)
- Re: news from Google Henry Linneweh (Dec 05)
- Re: news from Google Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- Re: news from Google Chris Hills (Dec 08)
- Re: news from Google Bret Clark (Dec 03)
- Re: news from Google Michael Holstein (Dec 07)
- Re: random DNS, was news from Google John Levine (Dec 07)
- Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Jared Mauch (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Paul Timmins (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Brielle Bruns (Dec 07)
- Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style) Jared Mauch (Dec 07)