nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGMP and PIM protection
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:42:37 +0530
Musing on the idea for a moment, it would surely be 'nice' to somehow know that PIM v2 joins from some other network were, in fact, 'good' or somehow well-formed, rate-limited, and/or somehow 'safe' to accept & hold state for. However, it seems as if the OP isn't interested in inter-domain "rp protection" -- and probably more interested in authenticating more local igmp v2/3 joins for STB's and the like.
Yup, i was currently looking at the IGMP v2/v3 joins only. Kent
Glen, clarify? -Tk
Current thread:
- IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- RE: IGMP and PIM protection Stefan Fouant (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Anton Kapela (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection David Barak (Dec 23)