nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 00:11:22 +0000
I can't in good conscience justify a /32. That is just too much space.
Then you need to go back to IPv6 101.
I believe I can, however, justify a separate /48 in Europe and APAC with my various offices and data centers in that region coming from the /48 for that region.
A /48 is for a single site. If you are operating a network connecting many sites, then you are a network operator and should get a /32 block. Don't try to fit more into a /48 than one single site. If you need to announce /33 or /34 prefixes to make things work, then deal with it. Talk to providers and explain what is going on. IPv6 routing is in its infancy and many people tend to set it up and let it run on autopilot. There is no law saying that you must announce one and only one /32 aggregate everywhere. For real technical solutions to your problem, you are probably better off going to the IPv6-ops list Subscription info is here <http://lists.cluenet.de/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-ops> --Michael Dillon --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Nathan Ward (Dec 22)
- RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Nathan Ward (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Michael Dillon (Dec 24)
- RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 24)
- RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. eric clark (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Shane Ronan (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Nathan Ward (Dec 22)
- RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Nathan Ward (Dec 22)
- Message not available
- RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 23)
- Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. Scott Leibrand (Dec 24)
- RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc. George Bonser (Dec 24)