nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: mikelieman () gmail com
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:16:04 +0000
Some nitwits just grab one out of fat air. I've seen 192.169.xx and 192.254.xx randomly used before. On Feb 2, 2009 12:03pm, sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
> What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a > closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done > sometimes.... There are sometimes good reasons to do this, for instance to ensure uniqueness in the face of mergers and acquisitions. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Stewart (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space mikelieman (Feb 02)
- RE: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matlock, Kenneth L (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Colin Alston (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chuck Anderson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chris Meidinger (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)