nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:47:51 -0500
On Feb 5, 2009, at 7:41 AM, TJ wrote:
It doesn't solve the problem of an enterprise with more than onelocation/network-interconnect... we can go around this rose bush again and again and again, but honestly, deployment of v6 happens for real when there is a significant business reason to deploy it, and when the real concernsofenterprises today are actually addressed.Indeed, and the IETF's answer for multi-homing (SHIM6) is a non- starter forthe majority of those interested in doing so. Enter PI space, now available from (most of) your local RIR(s). Yes, also enter DFZ growth ...
That is an answer, not the answer.You might be interested in the discussion around LISP (routing, not language).
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg00070.html https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp Regards Marshall
Current thread:
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Feb 04)
- RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Feb 04)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Feb 04)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Martin Hannigan (Feb 04)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Marshall Eubanks (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joe Abley (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Feb 05)
- Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 05)