nanog mailing list archives
Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands?
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:04:18 -0500
Peter Beckman wrote:
SO. Who's problem is this to fix? Is it: 1. Me? Am I a dope for using a very reliable but anycasted resolving name service? Clearly, I could just use the handy dandy easy to remember because I worked there 198.6.1.x, or is that an Internet faux pas because technically I wasn't given permission to use it?
We are network operators. We all use robust distributed name servers, along with our own (usually hidden) primary. But as a network operator, why aren't you running your own caching resolver? Not since the '80s have I ever needed to point at somebody else's resolver, the DNS is much better distributed now.
Current thread:
- L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Feb 06)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Wallace Keith (Feb 06)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Feb 06)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Feb 06)
- Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? William Allen Simpson (Feb 06)
- Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Stuart Henderson (Feb 06)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? TJ (Feb 07)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Feb 08)
- Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Mark Andrews (Feb 08)
- Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Joe Greco (Feb 08)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Feb 06)
- RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Wallace Keith (Feb 06)
- Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Nicolas Hyvernat (Feb 06)
- Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Stephen Stuart (Feb 06)