nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:02:07 -0500
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:28:11AM -0800, Tony Hain wrote: [snip]
starts with IP" and runs alongside IPv4 (like we used to do with decnet, sna, appletalk...), you will be comforted in all the similarities. You will
This is highly amusing, as for myself and many folks the experience of these 'other protocols', when trying to run in open, scalable, and commercially-viable deployments, was to encapsulate in IP(v4) at the LAN/WAN boundary. It is no wonder that is the natural reaction to IPv6 by those who have survived and been successful with such operational simplicity. Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Zaid Ali (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Joe Provo (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Steven Lisson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Brandon Galbraith (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 19)