nanog mailing list archives
Re: do I need to maintain with RADB?
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:01:59 -0800
On 19/02/2009 12:09, "Zaid Ali" <zaid () zaidali com> wrote:
Hi, need some advise here. Do I still need to maintain my objects (and pay) RADB? I use ARIN as source and all my route objects can be verified with a whois.
If you are happy using a RR which appears to only rely on a MAIL-FROM auth scheme then the ARIN RR is fine. If you'd like to have a stronger auth scheme available you might want to look at RADB. Leo
Current thread:
- do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Jon Lewis (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Darren Bolding (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Joe Provo (Feb 20)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Bruce Robertson (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Heather Schiller (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Paul Wall (Feb 20)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Darren Bolding (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Leo Vegoda (Feb 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Bruce Robertson (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Bruce Robertson (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Feb 19)
- Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Jon Lewis (Feb 19)