nanog mailing list archives
Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly
From: "Martin Hannigan" <martin () theicelandguy com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:13:54 -0500
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Skywing <Skywing () valhallalegends com> wrote:
Any "security" provided (I must assume that you speak of fraud prevention services) is the probablistic sort, of reducing, for example, aggregate (and not specific) losses.
Yes, probablistic in a wholistic fashion i.e. correlated against other datasets and used as a weight in a routine, for example, not necessarily a deciding factor. Best, -M<
Current thread:
- RE: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Skywing (Jan 04)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)