nanog mailing list archives
Re: question about BGP default routing
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:49:24 +0000 (GMT)
KC> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:05:48 -0600 KC> From: Kai Chen KC> is this router using a default routing for all the other KC> destinations? Either that: router> sh ip route 0.0.0.0 Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet or partial tables with no default: router> sh ip route 0.0.0.0 % Network not in table is what you'd expect. Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
Current thread:
- question about BGP default routing Kai Chen (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Jasper Bryant-Greene (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Edward B. DREGER (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Kai Chen (Jan 05)
- Re: question about BGP default routing chloe K (Jan 06)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Edward B. DREGER (Jan 06)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Edward B. DREGER (Jan 06)
- Re: question about BGP default routing Kai Chen (Jan 05)