nanog mailing list archives
Re: Point to Point Ethernet
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:52:25 +0200 (CEST)
1. What's the point of increasing the max MTU from 9000 to 9012? If we want a higher MTU, why not just ask for one in the next standard?To me the only reason for this would be to lessen overhead on small packets. Also, afaik standard payload MTU is 1500 for ethernet, anything else is vendor extension, outside the standard. Ethernet overhead compared to HDLC is pretty big...
Also, there would be small point in getting rid of the normal Ethernet headers if you still needed to use the standard Ethernet preamble and inter frame gap (a total of 20 bytes). These were really only needed for 10 Mbps Ethernet. I find it highly unlikely that such a change would be accepted - also I don't really see the big point. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- RE: Point to Point Ethernet, (continued)
- RE: Point to Point Ethernet David Barak (Jul 08)
- RE: Point to Point Ethernet Scott Berkman (Jul 08)
- RE: Point to Point Ethernet Frank Bulk (Jul 08)
- RE: Point to Point Ethernet David Barak (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet William Herrin (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Marshall Eubanks (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet William Herrin (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet sthaug (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet William Herrin (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet sthaug (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet William Allen Simpson (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet sthaug (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Andre Oppermann (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 08)
- RE: Point to Point Ethernet Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 08)
- Re: Point to Point Ethernet Randy Bush (Jul 08)