nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request for contact and procedure information
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:36:21 -0700
Dan White wrote:
Have you spoken with your provider? They should be giving you options, like changing your static address, or null routing the attackers upstream, or perhaps blocking port 80 to you, to limit your ingress traffic.
For DSL? I've never had that kind of luck with SBC's (now AT&T) home products, and I've been using their DSL since 2001. This is one instance where paying the big bucks for at least a T1 can show some some return. Even if it's "business DSL" it's still treated the same as "drooling user DSL". Purely my personal experience. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Request for contact and procedure information Charles Wyble (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Jeffrey Lyon (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Mark Price (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information John Peach (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Charles Wyble (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Adrian Chadd (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Dan White (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information William McCall (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Seth Mattinen (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Dan White (Jul 10)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Charles Wyble (Jul 10)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Seth Mattinen (Jul 10)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Dan White (Jul 10)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Seth Mattinen (Jul 10)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information John Peach (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Jon Kibler (Jul 09)
- Re: Request for contact and procedure information Jeffrey Lyon (Jul 09)