nanog mailing list archives
Re: questionable email filtering policies?
From: Chris Hills <chaz () chaz6 com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:28:31 +0200
On 23/07/09 22:22, goemon () anime net wrote:
Seems rather unwise to filter your abuse mailbox. ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abuse () btopenworld com> (reason: 554 Message not allowed - UP Email not accepted for policy reasons. Please visit http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer-04.html [120]) -Dan
On the topic of mail rejection I have come across a few sites that reject mail, even to postmaster@, from domains that have one or more ipv6-only MX records listed (i.e. a domain name with AAAA but no A record(s)). The common factor seems to be mimedefang.
Current thread:
- questionable email filtering policies? goemon (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Ben Carleton (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? goemon (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? John Levine (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? goemon (Jul 26)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? sthaug (Jul 27)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? John Levine (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Ben Carleton (Jul 23)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Chris Hills (Jul 24)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Florian Weimer (Jul 24)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Ken A. (Jul 24)
- Re: questionable email filtering policies? Florian Weimer (Jul 24)