nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
From: chris rollin <2600hz () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:25:30 -0500
Apparently not Back to the kids' table ! On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:38 AM, William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 20:05 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:There has been alot of customers on our network who were complainingabout ACKscan reports coming from 207.126.64.181. We had no choice but to blockthatsingle IP until the attacks let up....have you ever heard of forged packet headers? Just saying. William -- William Pitcock SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions 1-800-688-5018
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed., (continued)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Jon Lewis (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. goemon (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 27)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Tim Burke (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 27)