nanog mailing list archives
RE: spamhaus drop list
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:48:38 +0200 (CEST)
Hi!
Both containing prefixes that should not be announced on the internet, but often used by spammers trying to deliver their content.
When did you experience this last time, this is not what we see on various antispam projects.
So if you have new information, please share, we didnt see bogons used a lot at least the last 12 months.
Drop list is a completely different thing, and effective, but also effective to loos legitimate mails, the blocks inside there are too wide. I would not recommend people putting that inside iptables or something ;)
Bogon filtering is something that should be considered common practice. So your borders or upstreams should take care of that ;)
Bye, Raymond.
Current thread:
- Re: spamhaus drop list, (continued)
- Re: spamhaus drop list sthaug (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list J.D. Falk (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list John Levine (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Bret Clark (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Rich Kulawiec (Jun 18)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Sean Donelan (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)