nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:19:47 -0400
On 11 Mar 2009, at 11:53, Marcus Reid wrote:
A quick scan of the reverse mapping for your address space in DNS revealsthat you have basically your entire network on public addresses.
It's indeed nice to see people deploying networks the way there were supposed to be built, for once.
Nice troll, though. It has been at least a few weeks since the last "security = NAT" thread exploded in my inbox.
Joe
Current thread:
- RE: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?, (continued)
- RE: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Darden, Patrick S. (Mar 11)
- RE: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Jon Lewis (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Abley (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Alec Berry (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Jeremy L. Gaddis (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Alec Berry (Mar 11)
- RE: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Jon Lewis (Mar 11)
- RE: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Darden, Patrick S. (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Brett Charbeneau (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Marcus Reid (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Abley (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Brett Charbeneau (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Greco (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Mike Lewinski (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Peter Beckman (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Joe Greco (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? William Herrin (Mar 11)
- Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? J. Oquendo (Mar 12)