nanog mailing list archives
Re: XO peering.
From: Stefan Molnar <stefan () csudsu com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:42:21 -0800 (PST)
It just cleared up for me. Nice to have a call center complain constantly.
Thanks On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Stefan Molnar <stefan () csudsu com> wrote:There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our operations this morning. But looks like a side effect is after the hand off to NTT. Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT? As an example our route to Salesforce /21 is via NTT and it is not happy right now.This is from a host in XO AS2828 I can reach, for example, www.verio.net 204.202.20.3 / AS2914 NTT-COMMUNICATIONS-2914 just fine. www.salesforce.com is also reachable, through NTT -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- ALTDB.NET DNS? Jeff S Wheeler (Mar 09)
- Re: ALTDB.NET DNS? Jeremy Gaddis (Mar 09)
- Re: ALTDB.NET DNS? Steve Rubin (Mar 09)
- XO peering. Stefan Molnar (Mar 10)
- Re: XO peering. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 10)
- Re: XO peering. Stefan Molnar (Mar 10)
- Re: XO peering. ChrisSerafin (Mar 10)
- Re: XO peering. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 10)
- Re: XO peering. John Martinez (Mar 10)
- RE: XO peering. Jake Mertel (Mar 10)
- Re: XO peering. John Martinez (Mar 10)
- RE: XO peering. Mort, Eric (Mar 10)
- RE: XO peering. Kevin Oberman (Mar 10)
- RE: XO peering. Jake Mertel (Mar 10)
- Re: ALTDB.NET DNS? Jeremy Gaddis (Mar 09)