nanog mailing list archives
Re: Testing LFNs (Wrapup)
From: "Kaegler, Mike" <KaeglerM () tessco com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 13:20:49 -0400
Thanks to everyone who responded on and off-list! It seems evident that I didn't have a complete understanding of the iperf switches which alter buffer sizes. Several people made a few neat points, which I'll quickly summarize: * In iperf, -P will allow one to run multiple tcp tests at once. * IOS has a built-in tester... ttcp. http://tinyurl.com/6fp75j * For suggestions on changing the kernel buffer sizes: * . http://www.29west.com/docs/THPM/ (section 8) * . http://fasterdata.es.net/ * Linux.com has a related writeup: http://www.linux.com/feature/144532 Finally, "past performance does not indicate future results" applies here. 44mbit will not necessarily go clean just because 6 did. Thanks for the tips, -mKaegler On 5/6/09 11:10 AM, "Michael Kaegler" <kaeglerm () tessco com> wrote:
I have a new T3 thats 65msec long. I'd usually be using iperf to test new links, but at 65msec, even at the maximum window size, I can only get 6-8mbit through. No combination of options I've been able to find has gotten me more than 6mbit through this link. Should I just shotgun 9 copies of it? Are there better ways to test these links? Can one verify this link with just a pair of 7200s and linux machines on either side? Or is this something one really needs "real" test hardware for? If 6mbit go through clean, is there a real chance 44 will not? TIA, -mKaegler
-- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/
Current thread:
- Testing LFNs Kaegler, Mike (May 06)
- Re: Testing LFNs David Andersen (May 06)
- Re: Testing LFNs Ricky Beam (May 06)
- Re: Testing LFNs Kevin Oberman (May 06)
- Re: Testing LFNs (Wrapup) Kaegler, Mike (May 06)
- Re: Testing LFNs David Andersen (May 06)