nanog mailing list archives
Re: UCEProtect Level 3
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:13:04 +0530
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Skywing <Skywing () valhallalegends com> wrote:
I seem to recall that Mailstreet/MXlogic firewalls off (not rejects at SMTP level) any AS listed in UCEProtect, at least of about a year or so ago. - S
I would be very surprised indeed if MX Logic did something like that. srs
Current thread:
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3, (continued)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Matt Liotta (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 James Hess (May 08)
- Re: Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Claus v. Wolfhausen (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Seth Mattinen (May 07)
- RE: UCEProtect Level 3 Tomas L. Byrnes (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Colin Alston (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Jeffrey Meltzer (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Ken A (May 08)
- RE: UCEProtect Level 3 Skywing (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 07)
- RE: UCEProtect Level 3 John van Oppen (May 08)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: massive snowshoe operations may be a cause for concern (was: Re:UCEProtect Level 3) Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 08)
- RE: massive snowshoe operations may be a cause for concern (was: Re:UCEProtect Level 3) John van Oppen (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Matt Liotta (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 John Peach (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Colin Alston (May 08)