nanog mailing list archives
RE: AH or ESP
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf () tndh net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:00:51 -0700
Merike Kaeo wrote: ...
ESP-Null came about when folks realized AH could not traverse NATs.
Thus the absolute reason why people should promote AH to kill off the 66nat nonsense. Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled garden mindset. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: AH or ESP, (continued)
- Re: AH or ESP Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 22)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Randy Bush (May 26)
- RE: AH or ESP Tony Hain (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Roland Dobbins (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Nathan Ward (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Dave Israel (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Christopher Morrow (May 22)