nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering in Latin America
From: Malte von dem Hagen <mvh () hosteurope de>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:58:01 +0100
G'day, Am 01.11.2009 13:24 Uhr schrieb isabel dias:
peering in the IX's a.k.a peering -> unless is a payed service =private-peering! at the exchange
despite full sentences are clearly better to understand, the term "_private_ peering" does not necessarily include payments. It just means that the interconnect is not realized via a _public_ infrastructure as an IX's network e.g., but via _discrete_ p2p links, for example. Paid services are often referred to as "transit" or sometimes even "transit light" (meaning "my network and the ones of my customers", german Telekom uses this) or explicitly "_paid_ peering" (which is a misuse of the word peering, imho, as e.g. used by Arcor/Vodafone). At least over here the nomenclature is like that ;-) Kind regards, .m
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: Peering in Latin America isabel dias (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering in Latin America isabel dias (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America Malte von dem Hagen (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America isabel dias (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America Malte von dem Hagen (Nov 01)
- Peering in Latin America carlos munguia (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America Otmar Conradus (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America Jorge Amodio (Nov 01)
- Re: Peering in Latin America Michael Peddemors (Nov 01)