nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
From: Phil Pierotti <phil.pierotti () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:08:04 +1100
That's excellent news - any word on when Cisco will be back-porting these truly useful features from XR to that platform which so many of us are still running on (ie "traditional IOS")? Phil P On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Paul Cosgrove < paul.cosgrove.nanog () gmail com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil netwrote:The design differences you describe there relate more to traditional IOS vs JUNOS, rather than IOS XR vs JUNOS. IOS XR uses candidate configurations, commit, rollback etc. Paul.
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives, (continued)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Gary Mackenzie (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives sthaug (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Tore Anderson (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Leslie (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Daniel Roesen (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Randy Bush (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Jack Bates (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Paul Cosgrove (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Phil Pierotti (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives sthaug (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Tony Varriale (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Paolo Lucente (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Kevin Oberman (Nov 16)
- Fiber Cut in Italy Varaillon Jean Christophe (Nov 16)
- Re: Fiber Cut in Italy Hank Nussbacher (Nov 16)