nanog mailing list archives
Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering
From: Richard Bennett <richard () bennett com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:55:59 -0800
Yes, it's a good old-fashioned Usenet-style flame-fest. Sort of.It turns out you can say any damn thing you want about peering since nobody has any facts.
RB Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/how-video-is-changing-the-internet/ Does the FTC's question 106 hurt paid peering or not? 88 comments. Makes real interesting reading, I must say. srs
-- Richard Bennett Research Fellow Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Washington, DC
Current thread:
- fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Niels Bakker (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Randy Bush (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering bmanning (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Paul Wall (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering William Allen Simpson (Nov 25)