nanog mailing list archives
Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering
From: Richard Bennett <richard () bennett com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:32:02 -0800
Now you've descended from Steenbergen's hair-splitting between "on-net routes" (the mechanism) vs. "on-net access" (the actual product) into Simpson's straight-up lying. ITIF is not opposed to network neutrality in principle, having released a paper on "A Third Way on Network Neutrality", http://www.itif.org/index.php?id=63. There is not a single ultra-conservative on the ITIF board, they're all either moderate Democrats or moderate Republicans.
I'm letting most of this childish venting slide, but I will point out the bald-faced lies.
RB William Allen Simpson wrote:
They're opposed to net neutrality, and (based on his comments and severalof the papers) still think the Internet is some kind of bastard child thatneeds adult supervision in the middle -- by which they mean themselves /in loco parentis/. Looking at the board, it's populated by ultra-conservative wing-nut Republicans, and some Conservadems (as we call them in political circles, they call themselves "centrists") from the "New Democrat Caucus" for "bi-partisan" cover. And lots of lobbyists -- Federal lobbyists -- who seem to list their educational clients on their bio, but not whether they are also employed by a firm that represents other clients....
-- Richard Bennett Research Fellow Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Washington, DC
Current thread:
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering, (continued)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Niels Bakker (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Randy Bush (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering bmanning (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Paul Wall (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 24)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering William Allen Simpson (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses Rod Beck (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Paul Wall (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Aaron Cossey (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Randy Bush (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Jared Mauch (Nov 25)
- RE: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Ivan Pepelnjak (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Richard Bennett (Nov 25)
- Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering Darren Bolding (Nov 25)