nanog mailing list archives
Re: What DNS Is Not
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:54:01 -0500
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:25:49 CST, Dan White said:
That's a disagreement we'll have to have. Anytime this issue has been brought up in a public setting (here, slashdot, etc.) has resulted in terrible press and even corrective action. In particular, Network Solutions' attempt to at this at the .com level was corrected.
There's two types of in-flight editing of data by a provider: 1) The kind I've requested that they do. 2) The kind they're doing without my knowledge or consent. The first should be monetized, the second needs a really bright flashlight. Why is this distinction so hard for people to comprehend?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: What DNS Is Not, (continued)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Eduardo A. Suárez (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dan White (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dan White (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dan White (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Dobbins, Roland (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Eric Brunner-Williams (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Eduardo A. Suárez (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Michael Peddemors (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Paul Vixie (Nov 25)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Conrad (Nov 26)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Paul Vixie (Nov 26)