nanog mailing list archives
RE: ip options
From: "Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro)" <dciccaro () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:17:03 -0400
Luca: Check http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/sec_data_plane/configuration/guide/s ec_acl_sel_drop_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1 043334 Not the whole story, but :) Hope it helps, Dario
-----Original Message----- From: Luca Tosolini [mailto:bit.gossip () chello nl] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:06 PM To: nanog Subject: ip options Experts, out of the well-known values for ip options: X@r4# set ip-options ? Possible completions: <range> Range of values [ Open a set of values any Any IP option loose-source-route Loose source route route-record Route record router-alert Router alert security Security stream-id Stream ID strict-source-route Strict source route timestamp Timestamp I can only think of: - RSVP using router-alert - ICMP using route-record, timestamp But I can not think of any other use of any other IP option. Considering the security hazard that they imply, I am therefore thinking to drop them. Is any other ip options used by: ospf, isis, bgp, ldp, igmp, pim, bfd? Thanks, Luca.
Current thread:
- ip options Luca Tosolini (Oct 28)
- RE: ip options Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) (Oct 28)
- Re: ip options Roland Dobbins (Oct 28)
- PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL JD (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Jack Bates (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Saxon Jones (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL David E. Smith (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Walter Keen (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Mark Smith (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Nathan Ward (Oct 28)
- Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Sean Donelan (Oct 29)
- RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL Vince Mammoliti (Oct 29)
- PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL JD (Oct 28)