nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream BGP community support
From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:35:46 -0300
Agree'd :) On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
Here is the problem as I see it. Sure some % fo the people using BGP are bright nuff to use some upstreams communities, but sadly many are not. So this ends up breaking one or more networks, who in turn twist more dials causing other changes.. rinse, wash and repeat. But like Randy said who am I to stop anyone from playing... just means those of us with clue will be able to continue to earn a pay check for a very long time still :)i would rather earn it by designing things, not by cleaning up messes made by kiddies needing to show off. randy
Current thread:
- Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jeffrey Lyon (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support jim deleskie (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support jim deleskie (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Paul Wall (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Dorian Kim (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Dorian Kim (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)