nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:06:41 +0200
Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
Gadi Evron wrote:I think the need for someone being able to call 911 from their VoIP outweighs your right to claim that they should be disconnected from the Internet.Barton F Bruce wrote:Stopping the abuse is fine, but cutting service to the point that a family using VOIP only for their phone service can't call 911 and several children burn to death could bring all sorts of undesirable regulation let alone thebad press and legal expenses.While a legitimate concern it's also a red herring, as it's a technical problem looking for a technical solution.Gadi.
Again, I don't disagree, but I see it as a technical issue which is solvable. I don't see why this is THE issue. It's really just changing the subject of the discussion.
Besides, if that provider wants to help out, he might setup a captive portal or something with information regarding tools to clean their computer.
-- Gadi Evron, ge () linuxbox org. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
Current thread:
- Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients Gadi Evron (Oct 03)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients Peter Beckman (Oct 03)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients Rich Kulawiec (Oct 04)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Barton F Bruce (Oct 04)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Gadi Evron (Oct 04)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Barry Shein (Oct 05)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Owen DeLong (Oct 05)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 05)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Eugeniu Patrascu (Oct 06)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Gadi Evron (Oct 06)
- RE: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibilityfor bottedclients Barry Raveendran Greene (Oct 06)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients Peter Beckman (Oct 03)
- RE: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients lee (Oct 06)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Owen DeLong (Oct 06)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients mark [at] edgewire (Oct 06)
- Up Next: Quarantine Phishing (Was: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients) Jeroen Massar (Oct 06)
- Re: Up Next: Quarantine Phishing (Was: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients) Sean Donelan (Oct 07)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Barry Shein (Oct 06)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Peter Beckman (Oct 08)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility Joe Greco (Oct 06)
- Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility Alexander Harrowell (Oct 07)