nanog mailing list archives
RE: ISP customer assignments
From: "Lee Howard" <lee () asgard org>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:29:50 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov [mailto:Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 7:41 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ISP customer assignments Organizations will be provided /48s or smaller, but given the current issues with routing /48's globally, I think you will find more organizations fighting for /32s or smaller...
Most organizations will still be assigned a /48 (or whatever) from their ISP. Provider-aggregable addressing has no routing scalability problems.
I can see between IPv4 and IPv6 is how much of a pain it is to type a 128 bit address...
I have to agree, here. Moving between letters and numbers, and having to hit "shift" to use the colon wastes valuable keystrokes compared to the keypad. However, compare IPv6 vs IPv4-like numbering: 2001:db8:f1::1 81.93.35.12.241.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1 Did I type the right number of zeroes? Lee
Current thread:
- Re: ISP customer assignments, (continued)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Dan White (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Justin Shore (Oct 13)
- RE: ISP customer assignments Frank Bulk (Oct 14)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Dan White (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Bjørn Mork (Oct 06)
- RE: ISP customer assignments TJ (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments William Herrin (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Tim Durack (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Seth Mattinen (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Owen DeLong (Oct 06)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 06)