Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations

[David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>]

On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:17 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
> > My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as  
> > opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
>
> Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they  
> indicated they'd do prior to IANA allocating the /12s, you are  
> indeed wrong.  I'd be happy to hear things have changed.

Sigh. Seem to have troubles posting coherent English to the Nanog list  
recently.  The "they" in the above sentence references the RIRs except  
for APNIC (last I heard).

Regards,
-drc