nanog mailing list archives
109/8 - not a BOGON
From: Matthew Walster <matthew () walster org>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:22:01 +0100
Hi there, A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009. If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8 and 83/8 work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering. Matthew Walster
Current thread:
- 109/8 - not a BOGON Matthew Walster (Oct 09)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Shane Short (Oct 09)
- RE: 109/8 - not a BOGON John Stuppi (jstuppi) (Oct 09)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Leo Vegoda (Oct 09)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Matthew Palmer (Oct 10)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Matthew Walster (Oct 20)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Shane Short (Oct 20)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Tim Wilde (Oct 20)
- Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON Matthew Walster (Oct 20)