nanog mailing list archives
Re: multicast nightmare #42
From: Adrian Minta <adrian.minta () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:44:22 +0300
Philip Lavine wrote:
Please explain how this would be possible: 1 sender 1 mcast group 1 receiver ---------------- = no data loss 1 sender 1 mcast group 2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment -------------------- = data loss
Probably a crappy switch. -- Best regards,Adrian Minta
Current thread:
- multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Forestal, Andre Jr. (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Chadd (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Benson Schliesser (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 15)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Oct 15)
- Message not available