nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:05:34 +1300
On 18/10/2009, at 11:02 PM, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 18 Oct 2009, at 09:29, Nathan Ward wrote:RA is needed to tell a host to use DHCPv6This is not ideal.
Why? Remember RA does not mean SLAAC, it just means RA. -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Clue Store (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Andy Davidson (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chuck Anderson (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Andy Davidson (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 18)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- RE: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chuck Anderson (Oct 18)