nanog mailing list archives
Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0
From: Stefan Fouant <sfouant () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:46:44 -0400
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour <sergevautour () yahoo ca>wrote:
Hello, We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED.
Yep, OSPF-TE uses Type 10 LSAs, which only has an area flooding scope.
For this reason, we are looking at using only area 0. Only Loopback interfaces and p-p core ethernet links will be in OSPF. What are the maximum number of Routers & Links that folks would be comfortable with putting in 1 area? If folks are already using this type of approach, could you share your current numbers?
I've seen single areas with as many as ~600 routers and as many as 6-7k LSAs in the LSDB that functioned without any problems. -- Stefan Fouant
Current thread:
- Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Serge Vautour (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Stefan Fouant (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Christopher Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 sthaug (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Matthew Petach (Oct 19)