nanog mailing list archives
Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:31:39 -0400
Then let me say it. RA needs to be able to be completely turned off.DHCPv6 needs to be able to completely configure all requesting hosts.
Those two statements are not synonymous ... Sure, leave RA in the IPv6 stack. The market will decide, and we will see if
it is still on by default on soho routers and in IOS 15.4T in 2015. That is a more sensible statement. And were I to be a gambling man I would
say it will indeed be on by default ... we'll talk more about it then :). Also, I would like to add - there is a difference between the default gateway information and other things, such as NTP|DNS|SIP server information. The default gateway, by definition, is an on-link thing. IMHO, this makes the router a good source for information about the router. I am not saying use cases for "fully spec'ed DHCPv6" don't exist or should be ignored. Making the router capable of sharing the "missing piece" that covers ~95% of use cases is also a Good Thing. Thinking out loud, we could also re-create the idea of an auto-magic DNS by creating a special use case within ULA-space - say FD00::/96, saving the last 32 bits for something like ::53 and using anycast. *(Could abstract same idea to any stateless and/or light-session-based service ... FD00::123 for Automagic ULA-based anycast NTP, etc. Need 32 bits if we don't want to hex convert the >9999 things, just in case ...)* /TJ
Current thread:
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Perry Lorier (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David W. Hankins (Oct 23)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joel Jaeggli (Oct 24)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 24)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 25)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Scott Morris (Oct 25)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Petach (Oct 26)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Barak (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Vasil Kolev (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN James R. Cutler (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 21)