nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector
From: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:20:52 -0600
I would say confeds are more appropriate for larger ibgp networks. You can have reflectors inside confederations. See the BGP chapter of the JNCIP book. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Buraglio, Nicholas D <buraglio () illinois edu> wrote:
Lots of things can be used to determine how you decide to set up your BGP peers. https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/documentation/techdocs/downloads/pdf/350010.pdf has a decent amount of information on some of the differences that can help you decide how to set up your peerings. nb --- Nick Buraglio Network Engineer, CITES, University of Illinois GPG key 0x2E5B44F4 Phone: 217.244.6428 buraglio () illinois edu On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:52 PM, devang patel wrote:Hello, What are the advantages of BGP Confederation over Route Reflector? I mean when one should decide to deploy BGP Confederation over Route Reflector deployment? Thanks, Devang Patel
Current thread:
- BGP Confederation over Route Reflector devang patel (Sep 09)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Buraglio, Nicholas D (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Jason Iannone (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Michael Hallgren (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Jason Iannone (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Andy Davidson (Sep 19)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Buraglio, Nicholas D (Sep 10)