nanog mailing list archives
RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses"
From: "Ray Burkholder" <ray () oneunified net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:12:03 -0300
The apparent reason for this is that Google will rank links from different /24 higher then links from the same /24. So it's a SEO thingy.
Just in case anyone cares, from personal experience, I can see that Google's priority is indeed 'rank by content'. Everything else is fluff. I've chosen a key phrase or two, and incorporated them multiple times into a blog entry. Looking at Google a couple of days later for those key words, and I can get a top three ranking quite easily. Ray -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Current thread:
- Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Sebastian Wiesinger (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Mike Gazzerro (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Joel Jaeggli (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" William Pitcock (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Ray Burkholder (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Scott Howard (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Warren Kumari (Sep 22)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Ray Burkholder (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Leslie (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jay Nakamura (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Joe Greco (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Florian Weimer (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Michael Holstein (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" David Hubbard (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
(Thread continues...)