nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses"
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:09:24 +0800
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
We used to have a lot of people buying IP's in bulk for SEO. They would all cancel within one or two months citing that they couldn't afford it or the project failed, etc. Guess they realized that the whole thing is a myth.
.. or, which is more likely given my brief exposure to this crap, the search engines cottoned on and changed the metrics again. adrian
Current thread:
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses", (continued)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Leslie (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jay Nakamura (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Joe Greco (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Florian Weimer (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Michael Holstein (Sep 22)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" David Hubbard (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jeffrey Lyon (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Adrian Chadd (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)