Re: Single router for P/PE functions

[Serge Vautour <sergevautour () yahoo ca>]

We're trying to save on Transport links. Instead of multi-homing each PE to 2 Ps, we're considering building a ring: 
P-PE-PE-PE-P. This ring follows the transport ring. Each link would be engineering to make sure it can handle all of 
the traffic from all 3PEs in case of a failure. As the network grows, we could get individual transport links from PE-P.

Apart from bandwidth, I was curious if there were other problems I related to doing this that I wasn't thinking of. 
Thanks for all the replies. Much appreciated.

Serge




________________________________
From: William McCall <william.mccall () gmail com>
To: Serge Vautour <serge () nbnet nb ca>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 1:07:40 AM
Subject: Re: Single router for P/PE functions

Kinda depends on what you're doing exactly, but like Erik said, it certainly possible and depending on your particular 
needs, it might not be much of an issue at all.

Can you describe your scenario a bit more?

--WM


On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Serge Vautour <sergevautour () yahoo ca> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> > I'm pretty confident that a router can be used to perform P & PE functions simultaneously. What about from a best 
> > practice perspective? Is this something that should be completely avoided? Why? We're considering doing this as a 
> > temporary workaround but we all know temporary usually lasts a long time. I'd like to know what kind of mess awaits 
> > if we let this one go.
>
> > Thanks,
> Serge
>
>
>
>
> >      __________________________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now
> http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.


-- 
William McCall, CCIE #25044



      __________________________________________________________________
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at 
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com