nanog mailing list archives

Re: legacy /8


From: Cutler James R <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:01:18 -0400

I also just got a fresh box of popcorn.  I will sit by and wait for Jeroen to do a business analysis and tell me the 
return on investment. (Assuming that he can find any legal grounds for demanding return of legacy /8 allocations.)

All of the analysis results I have seen mention figuratively beating oneself [..painfully..] with combat boots.

Running out of IP addresses is not a soon realized scenario for IPv6. If an organization runs out of IP addresses, the 
difficulty is with top management, not the network or address space.

I think this is a many-iterated discussion, also know by some as a "rathole". 


On Apr 2, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:

I am curious. Once we're nearing exhausting all IPv4 space will there ever come a time to ask/demand/force returning 
all these legacy /8 allocations? I think I understand the difficulty in that, but then running out of IPs is also a 
difficult issue. :-)

For some reason I sooner see all IPv4 space being exhausted than IPv6 being actually implemented globally.

Greetings,
Jeroen


James R. Cutler
james.cutler () consultant com






Current thread: