nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:56:43 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Franck Martin wrote:
Anybody has better projections? What's the plan?
My guess is that end user access will be more and more NAT444:ed (CGN) while at the same time end users will get more and more IPv6 access (of all types), and over a period of time more and more of the p2p traffic (VoIP, file transfers etc) will move to IPv6 because it'll stop working over IPv4. When enough users have IPv6 access the server-based content will be made reachable over v6 as well.
The transition will take at least 5 years, I guess in 2015 we'll be perhaps halfway there.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Bill Bogstad (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Adrian Chadd (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Patrick Giagnocavo (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Campbell (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 19)
- RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Robert D. Scott (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Randy Bush (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Leo Bicknell (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? sthaug (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Kevin Loch (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mohacsi Janos (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 19)