nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:25:09 -0500
Simon Perreault wrote:
This is the latest proposal. The Security Considerations section needs some love... http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-softwire-port-control-protocol
Nice read. IF it ever makes it into all the necessary clients, then perhaps it might be a bit more feasible. That is a big if and very little time for adoption in a large number of devices to fix just one of the problems.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Karl Auer (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? William Herrin (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? isabel dias (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? William Herrin (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Simon Perreault (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 21)