nanog mailing list archives

Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site


From: Jim Burwell <jimb () jsbc cc>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:19:34 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
On 4/23/2010 05:42, Jared Mauch wrote:

On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:49 AM, Dave Hart wrote:

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:26 UTC, Steve Bertrand
<steve () ibctech ca> wrote:
- in WHOIS, I have ns1 and ns2.onlyv6.com listed as the
authoritative name servers

- both of these servers *only* have IPv6 addresses

Which seems a bit far afield from reality to me.  Yes, there are
lots of folks with IPv6 connectivity and v4-only recursive DNS
servers.  I don't think ISPs will have problems setting aside a
handful of IPv4 addresses for authoritative DNS infrastructure to
work around this until v6 transport in recursive DNS servers is
common enough.

Not really, having your nameservers be IPv6 enabled is a reasonable
thing to do.

FYI: on comcast I see SERVFAIL, meaning their recursives do not
have IPv6 transport.

(I know we have that at my employer on our customer-facing
recursives).

; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> any www.onlyv6.com. ;; global
options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status:
SERVFAIL, id: 54773 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0,
AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.onlyv6.com.            IN    ANY

;; Query time: 1605 msec ;; SERVER: 68.87.72.130#53(68.87.72.130)
;; WHEN: Fri Apr 23 08:41:08 2010 ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 32


You'll see a lot of this.  I've done my own little tests on a few
friends' systems, and on public wifi, etc, establishing some sort of
IPv6 connectivity, and trying to resolve a subdomaiin of mine with a
IPv6 only DNS server.  Many ISP recursive NS don't have IPv6 transport
yet, so they choke getting to my NS.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iEYEARECAAYFAkvRnmUACgkQ2fXFxl4S7sTfJwCfaKEB8juoXkHsgX7N+F+HNrEC
PDwAoJm+Hn8NhBi6LKcX00T9JTEA35ma
=nzM5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Current thread: