nanog mailing list archives
Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site
From: Jim Burwell <jimb () jsbc cc>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:19:34 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/23/2010 05:42, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:49 AM, Dave Hart wrote:On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:26 UTC, Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca> wrote:- in WHOIS, I have ns1 and ns2.onlyv6.com listed as the authoritative name servers - both of these servers *only* have IPv6 addressesWhich seems a bit far afield from reality to me. Yes, there are lots of folks with IPv6 connectivity and v4-only recursive DNS servers. I don't think ISPs will have problems setting aside a handful of IPv4 addresses for authoritative DNS infrastructure to work around this until v6 transport in recursive DNS servers is common enough.Not really, having your nameservers be IPv6 enabled is a reasonable thing to do. FYI: on comcast I see SERVFAIL, meaning their recursives do not have IPv6 transport. (I know we have that at my employer on our customer-facing recursives). ; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> any www.onlyv6.com. ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 54773 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.onlyv6.com. IN ANY ;; Query time: 1605 msec ;; SERVER: 68.87.72.130#53(68.87.72.130) ;; WHEN: Fri Apr 23 08:41:08 2010 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 32
You'll see a lot of this. I've done my own little tests on a few friends' systems, and on public wifi, etc, establishing some sort of IPv6 connectivity, and trying to resolve a subdomaiin of mine with a IPv6 only DNS server. Many ISP recursive NS don't have IPv6 transport yet, so they choke getting to my NS. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvRnmUACgkQ2fXFxl4S7sTfJwCfaKEB8juoXkHsgX7N+F+HNrEC PDwAoJm+Hn8NhBi6LKcX00T9JTEA35ma =nzM5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site, (continued)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Larry Sheldon (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Pete Carah (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Steve Bertrand (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Dave Hart (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Tim Franklin (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Dave Hart (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site isabel dias (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site isabel dias (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Jared Mauch (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site John Payne (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Jim Burwell (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site John Jason Brzozowski (Apr 24)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Owen DeLong (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Mark Andrews (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Jared Mauch (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Brielle Bruns (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Leo Bicknell (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Franck Martin (Apr 23)
- Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site Jack Bates (Apr 24)