nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?


From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:07:00 -0700



On 04/22/2010 08:25 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:04 AM, John Lightfoot wrote:

That's Hedley.


I believe that he is talking about Hedy Lamarr, the co-inventor of
frequency hopping spread spectrum.

The patent which bears her and George Antheil's name is by no means (and
about 30 years) the earliest example of this technology.

Regards
Marshall

-----Original Message-----
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
[mailto:bmanning () vacation karoshi com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
To: Simon Perreault
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
connection for anonymity purposes.

That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.

    not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
    patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.

--bill








Current thread: