nanog mailing list archives

Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:36:24 -0400

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 PDT, David Conrad said:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part
of the v6 internet

Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?

RFC4193 or PI address space, depending what problem you're trying to solve
by not renumbering.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: