nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:34:38 +0100
That adoption is so low at this point really says that it has failed.
In the real world, there is no success or failure, only next steps. At this point, IPv4 has failed, and IPv6 is the next step. No realistic alternative next steps exist at present. In addition any alternative next step to IPv6 would require massive forklift upgrades. IPv6 is already in place and has been for over 5 years. We just have to start using it. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Jim Burwell (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)