nanog mailing list archives
Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8)
From: Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:12:48 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Eliot Lear wrote:
If v6 is even close to ready, wouldn't it be sad that this sort of testing isn't done at interop? Or is it just sad that v6 isn't so close to being ready? Or is it both?
The suggestion was to run a "v6 only network". Does anyone on the NANOG list believe that v6 is at all ready to be run without any v4 underpinnings and provide a real service to a customer base?
-- Brandon Ross
Current thread:
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8), (continued)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Jon Lewis (Apr 05)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Brandon Galbraith (Apr 05)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Leo Vegoda (Apr 05)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 06)
- RE: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks) (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 06)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) bmanning (Apr 06)
- Re: interop show network Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Brandon Ross (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) bmanning (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Mark Smith (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network sthaug (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Leo Bicknell (Apr 07)